Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1998) pp. 3070-3073  |Next Article|  |Table of Contents|
|Full Text PDF (876K)| |Buy This Article|

Fundamental Examination of Cattle Red Blood Cells Damage with Ultrasound Exposure Microscopic System (UEMS)

Kawan Soetanto, Masahiro Kobayashi and Motoyoshi Okujima

Department of Engineering, Faculty of Control and System Engineering, Toin University of Yokohama, 1614 Kurogane-cho, Aoba-ku, Yokohama 225, Japan

(Received November 12, 1997; accepted for publication February 4, 1998)

In order to define the safety limit of the medical ultrasound equipment and to study the ultrasonic bioeffects, ultrasound exposure microscopic system (UEMS) was developed in our laboratory. We intended to observe the tissue damage caused by ultrasound exposure in real time. The change of size and shape of the cattle red blood cells was investigated experimentally with UEMS. It was observed that, at a driving frequency of 2.2 MHz, when the ultrasound intensity ISPTP was 28.4 W/cm2, the change of shape of the cattle red blood cells, due to the ultrasound exposure, occurred after 30 min of exposure. The change of size of the cattle red blood cells was investigated with a Coulter counter. The results, indicated that the size of the red blood cells after exposure to ultrasound was smaller than before exposure. Moreover, the results also indicated that, there was a tendency of the red blood cells to decrease in size after the ultrasound exposure when the ultrasound intensity was increased. At the two driving frequencies of 2.2 MHz and 0.55 MHz, in this study, the size of the cattle red blood cells decreased when the ultrasound intensities were increased.

URL: http://jjap.jsap.jp/link?JJAP/37/3070/
DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.37.3070
KEYWORDS:ultrasound exposure microscopic system (UEMS), ultrasound exposure, ultrasound intensity, red blood cells, damage, real time


|Full Text PDF (876K)| |Buy This Article| Citation:


References

  1. T. Iwabe: Acta Obst Gynaec Jpn. 45 (1993) 113. [in Japanese].
  2. K. Maeda: BME 2 (1998) 322. [in Japanese].
  3. S. Daniels, T. Komada and D. J. Price: Ultrasound Med. & Biol. 21 (1995) 105.
  4. J. A. veey, E. A. Gardner, J. B. Fowlkes, J. M. Rubin and P. L. Carson: Ultrasound Med. & Biol. 21 (1995) 757.
  5. C. X. Deng, Q. Xu, R. E. Apfel and C. K. Holland: Ultrasound Med. & Biol. 22 (1996) 939.
  6. K. Tadauchi, K. Sasaki, K. Kawabata, S. Umemura and Y. Taketani: J Med. Ultrason. 23 (1996) Suppl. 23-2, p. 265 [in Japanese].
  7. K. Soetanto, S. Ohtsuki. and M. Okujima: Proc. IEEE Ultrasonics Symp. 1990 (IEEE, Hawaii, 1990) p. 1417.
  8. K. Soetanto, M. Kobayashi and M. Okujima: IEICE Tech. Rep. US 97-1 (1997) 1 [in Japanese].
  9. M. Kobayashi, K. Soetanto and M. Okujima: J. Med. Ultrason. 24 (1997) 318 [in Japanese].
  10. A. A. Brayman , P. L. Strickler, H. Luan, S. L. Barned, C. H. Raeman, C. Cox and M. W. Miller: Ultrasound Med. & Biol. 23 (1997) 1237.
  11. A. W. L. Jay: Biophys. J. 13 (1973) 1166.
  12. R. P. Rand and A. C. Burton: Biophys. J. 4 (1964) 115.

|TOP|  |Next Article|  |Table of Contents| |JJAP Home|
Copyright © 2013 The Japan Society of Applied Physics
Contact Information