Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 41 (2002) pp. 3015-3019  |Next Article|  |Table of Contents|
|Full Text PDF (334K)| |Buy This Article|

Flexural Rigidity of a Single Microtubule

Toru Takasone, Saulius Juodkazis, Yuji Kawagishi, Akira Yamaguchi, Shigeki Matsuo, Hitoshi Sakakibara1, Haruto Nakayama1 and Hiroaki Misawa

Department of Ecosystem Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Tokushima, Minami-josanjima, Tokushima 770, Japan
1 Kansai Advanced Research Center, Communications Research Laboratory, Kobe 651-2401, Japan

(Received May 21, 2001; accepted for publication February 4, 2002)

Microtubules, which are flexible biopolymers, can be used for nanotechnology applications (e.g., nano-actuator) as they have a rigidity similar to that of plexyglass and other plastic materials. The flexural rigidity, or bending stiffness, of microtubules was measured using a laser trapping technique and dark-field microscopy. One end of a microtubule rod was chemically bound to a glass microsphere, while the other end was bound to a silica glass substrate. Then, the microsphere was laser-trapped and manipulated to exert three different deformation modes on the microtubule. The values of flexural rigidity for these deformations were between 10-25 and 10-23 Nm2 as measured for the 5–25 µm length microtubules. The origin of the length dependence of the flexural rigidity of microtubules is discussed.

URL: http://jjap.jsap.jp/link?JJAP/41/3015/
DOI: 10.1143/JJAP.41.3015


|Full Text PDF (334K)| |Buy This Article| Citation:


References | Citing Articles (24)

  1. R. C. Mucic, J. J. Storhoff, Ch. A. Mirkin and R. L. Letsinger: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 12674[CrossRef].
  2. Biomimetic Materials Processing. 1st Int. Symp. (BMMP-1), Nagoya, Japan, 2001.
  3. S. Ray, E. Meyhfer, R. A. Milligan and J. Howard: J. Cell Biol. 121 (1993)1082.
  4. J. R. Dennis, J. Howard and V. Vogel: Nanotechnology 10 (1999) 232[IoP STACKS].
  5. L. Limberis and R. J. Stewart: Nanotechnology 11 (2000) 47[IoP STACKS].
  6. J. I. Sohn, S. Lee, Y.-H. Song, S.-Y. Choi, K.-I. Cho and K.-S. Nam: Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 (2001) 901[AIP Scitation].
  7. Y. H. Tang, N. Wang, Y. F. Zhang, C. S. Lee, I. Bello and S. T. Lee: Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 (1999) 2921[AIP Scitation].
  8. M. P. Siegal, D. R. Tallant, P. N. Provencio, D. L. Overmyer, R. L. Simpson and L. J. Martinez-Miranda: Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 (2000) 3052[AIP Scitation].
  9. G. V. Shivashankar, G. Stolovitzky and A. Libchaber: Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 (1998) 291[AIP Scitation].
  10. Y. Tsuda, H. Yasutake, A. Ishijima and T. Yanagida: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.) 93 (1996) 12937.
  11. Y. Arai, R. Yasuda, K.-I. Akashi, Y. Harada, H. Miyata, K. Kinosita and H. Itoh: Nature 399 (1999) 446[CrossRef].
  12. G. J. L. Wuite, S. B. Smith, M. Young, D. Keller and C. Bustamante: Nature 404 (2000) 103[CrossRef].
  13. H. Nagashima and S. Asakura: J. Mol. Biol. 136 (1980) 169.
  14. M. Miwa, S. Juodkazis and H. Misawa: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 39 (2000) 1930[JSAP].
  15. M. Kurachi, M. Hoshi and H. Tashiro: Cell Motil. & Cytoskeleton 30 (1995) 221.
  16. J. M. Gere and S. P. Timoshenko: Mechanics of Materials (PWS-Kent Publishing, Boston, 1984) 2nd ed.
  17. K. Svoboda and S. M. Block: Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 23 (1994) 247.
  18. A. Schiebener: J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 19 (1990) 677.
  19. H. Felgner, R. Frank and M. Schliwa: J. Cell Sci. 109 (1996) 509.
  20. M. Kurachi, M. Kikumoto, H. Tashiro, Y. Komiya and T. Tashiro: Cell Motil. & Cytoskeleton 42 (1999) 87.
  21. F. Gittes, B. Mickey, J. Nettleton and J. Howard: J. Cell Biol. 120 (1993) 923.

|TOP|  |Next Article|  |Table of Contents| |JJAP Home|
Copyright © 2013 The Japan Society of Applied Physics
Contact Information